Skip to content
LAW’S|EMPIRICS

LAW’S|EMPIRICS

Legal Empirics in Europe

  • Home
  • Editors & Authors
  • Imprint
  • de_DE
Posted on Fri, 20. November 2020Thu, 21. January 2021

Online Symposium “Empirical Turn”

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.06
Ten years ago, German legal researcher Niels Petersen published an academic manifesto (in German, accompanied by an abstract in English) analysing whether continental jurisprudence might need an "empirical turn". His article provoked various responses, including a sharply worded backlash by Ino Augsberg who criticized the "recent empiricist tone in jurisprudence". Ten years later, we revisit the debate in an Online Symposium by Law's|Empirics. Are we any wiser today? Did the passage of time vindicate one view or the other? Or was the disagreement solely about words, maybe even a misunderstanding? Our symposium lets both authors revisit the issue and update the debate, in addition to...
READ MORE
Authors
Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
Prof. Dr. Emanuel V. Towfigh
Prof. Dr. Emanuel V. Towfigh
Category
Online-Symposien, Online-Symposium Empirische Wende, Wissenschaftliche Beiträge
Tags
empirical legal studies, empirics, epistemology, jurisprudence, legal research, Symposium
Posted on Wed, 1. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Is There a Relationship Between Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development?

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.04
by Prof. Simon Deakin Ph.D, Prof. Prabirjit Sarkar Ph.D. and Prof. Dr. Mathias Siems
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 1. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Are apex court judges politically biased?

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.03
by Prof. Dr. Niels Petersen
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 1. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Augmented Doctrinal Reality Exploring and Analysing Judicial Discourse with Computer-Aided Methods

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.02
by Prof. Dr. Arthur Dyevre
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 1. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

What do Lawyers Have to Count (on)? On the Role of Lawʼs|Empirics in European Legal Studies

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.01
by Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
READ MORE
«123

Tags

  • Bias
  • Business Judgment Rule
  • BVerfG
  • Call for papers
  • causal inference
  • CELS
  • Computational Legal Studies
  • conference
  • constitutional court
  • Courts
  • COVID
  • empirics
  • evaluation
  • experimental economics
  • external validity
  • Fahrlässigkeit
  • federalism
  • field experiments
  • France
  • Hindsight Bias
  • Judge Data Ban
  • Judges
  • judicial election
  • Judicial Reform Act
  • laboratory experiment
  • Law & Society
  • legal empirics
  • Legal Tech
  • Negligence
  • Predictive Analytics
  • Psychologie
  • RCTs
  • regulation
  • Richterablehnung
  • risk assessment
  • Rückschaufehler
  • science
  • shareholder protection
  • shareholder rights
  • state exam
  • Statistical Pattern Recognition
  • stock market
  • Urteilsfehler
  • Urteilsheuristik
  • USA
© 2021 LAW’S|EMPIRICS