What do Lawyers Have to Count (on)? On the Role of Lawʼs|Empirics in European Legal Studies

Abstract | In Continental Europe, traditional legal thinking is rather remote from empirical research and statistics. Nonetheless lawyers have been trying for more than one hundred years to fuse knowledge about society’s “isʼs and oughts”. Their attempts had to continuously adapt to changes in the dominant intellectual paradigms, and are now framed as discursive argumentation about different normatively infused descriptions of the world. As such, empirical discourse is indispensable for the law and will shape legal education in the future. Complex legal realities require statistical legal thinking. The new academic blog Law’s|Empirics seeks to document and support this development, and provide easily intelligible work-in-progress reports from empirical legal scholars.

The main article is only available in German. If you read German, please click the flag in the top menu and you will be guided to the full text in German.

Distributed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0
Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
Hanjo Hamann is a Senior Research Fellow (assistant professor equivalent) at the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. His research interests include contracts and corporations and their interdisciplinary facets, especially in legal linguistics, behavioral economics, and digital humanities. His work connects doctrinal analyses with findings from empirical methods, most of them quantitative and computer-assisted.
Suggested Citation
Hamann, What do Lawyers Have to Count (on)?, LAW’S|EMPIRICS, 05/01/19, DOI: 10.25527/re.2019.01