Skip to content
LAW’S|EMPIRICS

LAW’S|EMPIRICS

Legal Empirics in Europe

  • Home
  • Editors & Authors
  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • de_DE
Posted on Mon, 8. July 2019

The Forbidden Tree of KnowledgeFrance restricts predictive analytics for judicial decisions

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.09
The problem with new methods and sources of knowledge is that these can bring forth facts that do not always please all those involved. But to prohibit the pursuit for knowledge and insight is rather absurd in a transparent state at the latest after the Age of Enlightenment. In France this seems to be seen differently. In fact, France has recently adopted a law reforming the judicial system. Article 33 of the law has caused an international controversy. It reads literally: "Les données d'identité des magistrats et des membres du greffe ne peuvent faire l'objet d'une réutilisation ayant pour objet ou pour effet d'évaluer, d'analyser, de comparer ou de prédire leurs pratiques...
READ MORE
Author
Nico Kuhlmann
Category
Academic Posts
Tags
Computational Legal Studies, France, Judge Data Ban, Judicial Reform Act, Legal Tech, Predictive Analytics, Statistical Pattern Recognition
Posted on Fri, 28. June 2019

Der Rückschaufehler Das Problem der Ex-ante-Perspektive bei der Fahrlässigkeitsbeurteilung ex post

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.08
by Dipl.-Psych. Alica Mohnert and Dr. Daniel Effer-Uhe
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 5. June 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Why lab experiments are a powerful tool for legal scholarship

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.07
by Dr. Konstantin Chatziathanasiou and Dr. Monika Leszczyńska
READ MORE
Posted on Sun, 12. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Related Party Transactions of Listed Companies in Germany

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.06
by Prof. Dr. Andreas Engert and Prof. Dr. Tim Florstedt
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 1. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Standardization of State Exams or Competition in the Federal System?

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.05
by Prof. Dr. Lorenz Kähler
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 1. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Is There a Relationship Between Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development?

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.04
by Prof. Simon Deakin Ph.D, Prof. Prabirjit Sarkar Ph.D. and Prof. Dr. Mathias Siems
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 1. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Are apex court judges politically biased?

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.03
by Prof. Dr. Niels Petersen
READ MORE
12»

Tags

  • Bias
  • Business Judgment Rule
  • causal inference
  • Computational Legal Studies
  • Courts
  • empirics
  • experimental economics
  • external validity
  • Fahrlässigkeit
  • federalism
  • France
  • Hindsight Bias
  • Judge Data Ban
  • Judges
  • Judicial Reform Act
  • laboratory experiment
  • Law & Society
  • legal empirics
  • Legal Tech
  • Negligence
  • Predictive Analytics
  • Psychologie
  • Richterablehnung
  • Rückschaufehler
  • shareholder protection
  • shareholder rights
  • state exam
  • Statistical Pattern Recognition
  • stock market
  • Urteilsfehler
  • Urteilsheuristik
© 2019 LAW’S|EMPIRICS