Skip to content
LAW’S|EMPIRICS

LAW’S|EMPIRICS

Legal Empirics in Europe

  • Home
  • Editors & Authors
  • Imprint
  • de_DE
Posted on Mon, 24. July 2023Mon, 24. July 2023

“Valid Law” MethodologyHow can we make criminal law dogmatics objective?

DOI 10.25527/re.2023.10
Legal dogmatics of criminal law is a subject of inquiry in legal science, but its objectivity is a matter of debate. It might be seen as the presentation of subjective values by individual scholars, lacking objectivity. Others argue that objectivity can be achieved by selecting and presenting objectively correct dogmatic from legal texts. In another perspective, legal dogmatics is viewed as a description of the present status of effective criminal law, which could be considered objective. Legal Dogmatics and Objectivity in Germany and Japan In Germany, legal dogmatics of criminal law aims to interpret the criminal code systematically and normatively, without contradiction, using logical...
READ MORE
Author
Prof. Dr. Shin Matsuzawa
Category
Academic Posts
Tags
interviews, legal realism, psychology, qualitative research, Rechtsrealismus
Posted on Thu, 30. March 2023Wed, 5. April 2023

Empirical legal research to test judicial decisions

DOI 10.25527/re.2023.04
by Lydia Dalhuisen, PhD
READ MORE
Posted on Mon, 27. March 2023Thu, 30. March 2023

Empirical Legal Research: a state of knowledge across Europe International Conference at the University of Toulouse (9+10 June 2023)

DOI 10.25527/re.2023.03
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
READ MORE
Posted on Sat, 25. March 2023Mon, 27. March 2023

A bridge over clashing waters? Empirical legal studies bridging structural and poststructural feminist standpoints in research

DOI 10.25527/re.2023.02
by Sofie Karlsson, M.A.
READ MORE
Posted on Mon, 25. July 2022Tue, 4. April 2023

Scopus/Scimago: Useless for Studying Legal Research! An Empirical Assessment of Misclassification Rates in a Popular Scientometric Data Source

DOI 10.25527/re.2022.02
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann and Lill Emmelheinz
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 5. January 2022Tue, 4. April 2023

Court Decisions: 99 % Uncharted Deep Sea? Mapping the Blind Spot of Digital Legal Studies over Half a Century (1971-2019)

DOI 10.25527/re.2022.01
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
READ MORE
Posted on Tue, 5. October 2021

Legal Network Analytics 101

DOI 10.25527/re.2021.11
by Seán Fobbe
READ MORE
Posted on Thu, 29. July 2021Thu, 29. July 2021

Empirical Tax Research in Germany Federal Government Plans to Establish New Institute (IfeS)

DOI 10.25527/re.2021.09
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann and Dr. Julia Kraft
READ MORE
Posted on Thu, 24. June 2021Thu, 24. June 2021

Berkeley 12 – 0 Stanford International Pedigrees of Private Law Professors in Germany

DOI 10.25527/re.2021.07
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
READ MORE
Posted on Fri, 20. November 2020Thu, 24. June 2021

Online Symposium “Empirical Turn”

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.06
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann and Prof. Dr. Emanuel V. Towfigh
READ MORE
Posted on Fri, 20. November 2020Fri, 20. November 2020

Die empirische Wende in der Rechtswissenschaft Online-Symposium »Empirische Wende«

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.07
by Prof. Dr. Niels Petersen
READ MORE
Posted on Fri, 20. November 2020Fri, 20. November 2020

Theatrum mundi Online-Symposium »Empirische Wende«

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.08
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Ino Augsberg
READ MORE
Posted on Tue, 20. October 2020Tue, 20. October 2020

Correspondence Experiments in Law An Empirical Approach to Anti-Discrimination Jurisprudence

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.05
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 13. May 2020Thu, 14. May 2020

Continuity in the Federal Constitutional Court?

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.04
by Marie-Lou Sohnius, Dr. Benjamin G. Engst and Prof. Thomas Gschwend, Ph.D.
READ MORE
Posted on Sat, 28. March 2020Sat, 28. March 2020

Governing through the Primacy of Science

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.03
by Tobias Gumpp
READ MORE
Posted on Sun, 15. March 2020Sat, 28. March 2020

14th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Eight scholars from Germany present their empirical legal scholarship in the US

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.02
by Gilien Silsby and Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 5. February 2020Sat, 28. March 2020

10 Days Left to Register for CELSE in Oslo Registration for 3rd Conference on Empirical Legal Studies in Europe closes on 15th Feb

DOI 10.25527/re.2020.01
by Prof. Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
READ MORE
Posted on Mon, 8. July 2019

The Forbidden Tree of Knowledge France restricts predictive analytics for judicial decisions

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.09
by Nico Kuhlmann
READ MORE
Posted on Fri, 28. June 2019Sun, 29. March 2020

The Hindsight Bias On the problem of ex ante knowledge in negligence assessment ex post

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.08
by Dipl.-Psych. Alica Mohnert and Dr. Daniel Effer-Uhe
READ MORE
Posted on Wed, 5. June 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Why lab experiments are a powerful tool for legal scholarship

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.07
by Dr. Konstantin Chatziathanasiou and Dr. Monika Leszczyńska
READ MORE
Posted on Sun, 12. May 2019Wed, 12. June 2019

Related Party Transactions of Listed Companies in Germany

DOI 10.25527/re.2019.06
by Prof. Dr. Andreas Engert and Prof. Dr. Tim Florstedt
READ MORE
12»

Tags

  • bibliometrics
  • Business Judgment Rule
  • BVerfG
  • CELS
  • citations analysis
  • constitutional court
  • court decisions
  • empirical legal studies
  • empirics
  • environmental law
  • epistemology
  • experiment
  • feminism
  • field study
  • France
  • intersectionality
  • interviews
  • judicial decision-making
  • judicial election
  • jurisprudence
  • juristische Netzwerkforschung
  • law databases
  • legal realism
  • legal research
  • legal studies
  • Netzwerkanalyse
  • Netzwerkdaten
  • open data
  • open government
  • opinion polling
  • precedent
  • psychology
  • publication bias
  • public law
  • qualitative research
  • Rechtsrealismus
  • scientometrics
  • Scopus
  • survey
  • Symposium
  • tax research
  • Toulouse
  • transparency
  • Turkey
  • USA
© 2023 LAW’S|EMPIRICS