Correspondence Experiments in Law An Empirical Approach to Anti-Discrimination Jurisprudence

Abstract | German law prohibits certain kinds of discrimination in private contract relationships. How can systemic discrimination be identified though? Recently, studies have employed “correspondence experiments”, a type of field experiment related to vignette studies: Researchers assume fictitious identities to enter into contract negotiations, and systematically vary the demographic characteristics of their assumed identity. By measuring the respective reaction of other parties, researchers can therefore isolate the causal effect of specific demographic factors on discriminatory responses. A new study from Germany (just published in the academic journal NZM) has used this methodology to identify discrimination on the housing market, based on whether a tenant received social welfare. The authors propose to follow the Irish example and to officially prohibit discrimination based on tenants’ welfare-status.

The main article is only available in German. If you read German, please click the flag in the top menu and you will be guided to the full text in German.

Distributed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0
Dr. Dr. Hanjo Hamann
Hanjo Hamann is a Senior Research Fellow (assistant professor equivalent) at the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. His research interests include contracts and corporations and their interdisciplinary facets, especially in legal linguistics, behavioral economics, and digital humanities. His work connects doctrinal analyses with findings from empirical methods, most of them quantitative and computer-assisted.
Suggested Citation
Hamann, Correspondence Experiments in Law, LAW’S|EMPIRICS, 10/20/20, DOI: 10.25527/re.2020.05